|
But
lo! Someone did. Not someone from the Auschwitz Museum but Charles
"Chuck" Provan, a letterhead printer in Monongahela, Pennsylvania, and
another scheduled speaker here in California. A man of childlike enthusiasms, a
roly-poly, red-bearded, merry man, a man with a brandy-glass-shaped face, he’d
been an earnest denier until he had an epiphany in December 1990. Provan was
home in Monongahela reading from The Confessions of Kurt Gerstein, an SS
man who confessed he was at the concentration camp in Belzec, Poland, and I
see everything! The mothers, their babies at the breast, the little naked
children, the men and women, naked. They enter into the death chamber,
pushed by the leather whips of the SS. Pack well, that is what [the] captain
ordered. Seven to eight hundred persons on twenty-five square meters. More
than half are children… "An
experiment. How many kids can fit in a gas chamber." "You
shouldn’t use the kids like that. It’s sorta gruesome." "Aw,
it won’t hurt them," said Provan in his down-home voice and had the kids
strip to their underwear. He packed them into a corner, then with two dressers
corralled them into a square of sixteen by sixteen inches. Then, setting them
free, he used an electronic calculator to calculate to his astonishment that he
could fit 891 children into the gas chamber at Belzec. Tears came to Provan’s
eyes, for he saw the Confessions differently now. Its author, he saw,
wouldn’t say something so impossible, incredible, nonsensical, something no
one would believe for one half century, if he himself hadn’t witnessed it.
Gerstein, the SS man, had seen Jews die at Belzec ("One hears them weeping,
sobbing") and the Holocaust had indeed happened. Provan
did two more experiments even as Mrs. Provan, a sort of Cesare Cremonini, the
colleague of Galileo’s who wouldn’t look into Galileo’s telescope, told
him, "You shouldn’t." In one he used five kids, three manikins, and
one doll, in the other five kids, three adults—a printer, a minister, and an
Italian woman who said, "You’re nuts, but I’ll do it," all with
their clothes on—and the doll, and he calculated that seven hundred fathers,
mothers, children and babies would fit in the chamber at Belzec. And this year
in March, he used the same scientific method on the "No holes? No
Holocaust!" hypothesis, going with some of his children (he had nine now)
to one collapsed chamber at Auschwitz. The witnesses there had said the holes
were alongside the central columns, and Provan used a $40 metric measuring tape
to find where the columns had been and find, well, whaddya know? those
celebrated holes. No longer were they twenty-five by twenty-five centimeters, as
the witnesses had said. Now, with the roof blown up, they were larger, and
Provan photographed them, came home to Monongahela, wrote up a monograph,
printed it at his print shop, and printed a cover that, in gold letters, with
the exclamation point demoted to a question mark, said NO HOLES? NO
HOLOCAUST? He then flew to Orange County and appeared at the palm-filled
hotel on Saturday afternoon. Not
even washing up, he sat with childlike delight on a flowery lobby love-seat by
the Kentia palm handing his two dozen spiral-bound copies to the illuminati of
Holocaust denial. If he expected encomiums he misunderstood human nature, which
clings to our established beliefs as though to a life preserver without which we’d
sink to the jet-black depths of the Mindanao Trough. "You have a bent
towards evil," the chief denier from Australia, a man of German ancestry,
told Provan. "You slander the German people. You believe in the
Holocaust." "But Charles, if I may call you Charles, bring me the pudding,"
said the chief denier alive, a Frenchman and the man who coined the "No
holes? No Holocaust!" motto. "Bring me the holes of twenty-five
by twenty-five centimeters." "Oh,
I can’t," said Provan. "Where
do you see a square of twenty-five by twenty-five?" "Oh,
not anymore. But this hole is big enough to have held it." "But
you don’t have a square of twenty-five centimeters." "I
admit that." "This
cannot convince me," the Frenchman said. The angriest denier was David
Irving, the British historian, the man who’d said in London that a photograph
of a hole would drive such a metaphorical hole in his case that he couldn’t
defend it. Irving, who isn’t allowed at Auschwitz and may have been jealous of
an amateur’s access, sat at the open-aired downstairs restaurant in front of a
Caesar’s salad. On spotting Provan, he turned black, and his words came like
chisel chips. "I’m hopping mad," Irving said. "If I were an SS
man and somebody said, ‘Knock some holes in that ceiling, will you? We’re
going to start putting cyanide in,’ I’d make those holes in the middle of
some empty area. I wouldn’t put them bang, bang, bang, bang, next to the
load-bearing pillars. What were the load-bearing pillars for? Just cosmetic
purposes?" Provan, twenty years younger, stood like a boy called down to
the principal’s office, looking abashed, and Irving continued, "The
Germans spend God knows how many hundreds of thousands of pounds building this?
And then they allow some jerk with a sledgehammer to punch holes next to the
load-bearing pillars? I’m having lunch," said Irving abruptly, and he
attacked his salad without a whit of his ardent convictions voided by Provan’s
photographs. Of course, the deniers would say it’s Provan and I whose
convictions weren’t voided by Irving, and it may be a hundred years before we
know whose views prevail. "We have won," an SS man told Primo Levi at
Auschwitz. "There may be suspicions, but there will be no certainties,
because we’ll destroy the evidence together with you."
|